<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>uvageek &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uvageek.net/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uvageek.net</link>
	<description>The legends, stories and tribulations of a UVA Physics Grad...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:53:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VMWare ESX 3.5i &#8211; Lenovo T61</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2008/07/30/vmware-esx-35i-lenovo-t61/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2008/07/30/vmware-esx-35i-lenovo-t61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T61]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare ESX 3.5i]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BLUF &#8211; Attempted to load VMWare ESX 3.5i on a Lenovo T61.Â  Failed to find device to write to in either AHCI or SATA Compatibility modes when attempting to use VMWare ESX Thin Installer.
So you&#8217;re not familiar with &#8220;BLUF&#8221;?Â  Bottom Line Up Front&#8230;
Nonetheless, decided to attempt to pop in a spare 100 GB [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLUF &#8211; Attempted to load VMWare ESX 3.5i on a Lenovo T61.Â  Failed to find device to write to in either AHCI or SATA Compatibility modes when attempting to use VMWare ESX Thin Installer.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re not familiar with &#8220;BLUF&#8221;?Â  Bottom Line Up Front&#8230;</p>
<p>Nonetheless, decided to attempt to pop in a spare 100 GB Seagate Momentus 7200 SATA hard drive into my Lenovo T61 Core 2 Duo laptop and attempt installation of the newly free <a href="https://www.vmware.com/tryvmware/login.php?eval=esxi&amp;t=1" target="_blank">VMWare ESX 3.5i software</a>.Â  Burned a copy of VMWare ESX 3.5i onto a CD and went from there, watching the ThinStaller make its way through the hardware compatibility list only to stop when it didn&#8217;t find the appropriate SCSI interface to load VMWare onto.</p>
<p>So lesson of the day &#8211; make sure that youv&#8217;e got a SCSI interface to allow VMWare ESX to continue its installation on your laptop if you&#8217;re hoping to use it as such.Â  Good luck on finding a laptop with said interface <img src='http://uvageek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2008/07/30/vmware-esx-35i-lenovo-t61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro or no&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/22/macbook-pro-or-no/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/22/macbook-pro-or-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life as we know it...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2008/06/22/macbook-pro-or-no/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been contemplating buying a MacBook Pro for a while now.&#160; And yes, I realize that there will be a hardware refresh sometime in the next six to eight months&#8230; though I also realize that in the past whenever Apple has done a hardware refresh that there are typically some small problems (warping of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve been contemplating buying a MacBook Pro for a while now.&nbsp; And yes, I realize that there will be a hardware refresh sometime in the next six to eight months&#8230; though I also realize that in the past whenever Apple has done a hardware refresh that there are typically some small problems (warping of cases, etc.) during said releases which means that the current MacBook Pro which is nimble and quick is at the height of its refinement.</p>
<p>What to do&#8230; Thoughts? Recommendations?&nbsp; I know, go read a forum and make my own decision, but those are coming from folks that I don&#8217;t know <img src='http://uvageek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Now Playing &#8211; Charlie Haden &#8211; Land of the Sun &#8211; Sueno Solo Con Tu Amor (I Only Dream of Your Love)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/22/macbook-pro-or-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sync&#8217;ing Google Calendar with Mozilla Thunderbird</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/01/syncing-google-calendar-with-mozilla-thunderbird/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/01/syncing-google-calendar-with-mozilla-thunderbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2008/06/01/syncing-google-calendar-with-mozilla-thunderbird/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you want to keep your desktop calendar synchronized and visualized through Mozilla Thunderbird because you just can get used to using something like Google Calendar&#8217;s web interface?
Look no further than the Lightning plugin for Mozilla Thunderbird along with the Win32 Provider add-on for Google Calendar for Lightning / Sunbird.
So how do I use them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want to keep your desktop calendar synchronized and visualized through Mozilla Thunderbird because you just can get used to using something like Google Calendar&#8217;s web interface?</p>
<p>Look no further than the Lightning plugin for Mozilla Thunderbird along with the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4631" target="_blank">Win32 Provider add-on for Google Calendar</a> for Lightning / Sunbird.</p>
<p>So how do I use them all together?&nbsp; Check out this blog entry&#8230;</p>
<p><a title="http://bfish.xaedalus.net/?p=239" href="http://bfish.xaedalus.net/?p=239">http://bfish.xaedalus.net/?p=239</a></p>
<p>Note that there are updated providers for Lightning and Sunbird&#8230; for the latest, check out <a title="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/" href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/">http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m using the 0.4 version of the provider for Google Calendar with Lightning integration in Mozilla Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 with Lightning 0.8 and so far I&#8217;m liking it.&nbsp; The only thing that I&#8217;ve found isn&#8217;t working is the Invite Attendees functionality &#8211; otherwise, pretty tight integration.</p>
<p>Now Playing &#8211; Relient K &#8211; Mmhmm &#8211; When I Go Down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2008/06/01/syncing-google-calendar-with-mozilla-thunderbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panera Packet Size Limitation?</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/12/02/panera-packet-size-limitation/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/12/02/panera-packet-size-limitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/12/02/panera-packet-size-limitation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone had issues where you&#8217;re attempting to upload files through anÂ  HTTP interface web method of sorts while at Panera bread and hit a package limit of 500 kilobytes?Â  Just curious as I&#8217;m attempting to upload a few pictures to Flickr.com through their web site and hitting a size limit &#8211; pretty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had issues where you&#8217;re attempting to upload files through anÂ  HTTP interface web method of sorts while at Panera bread and hit a package limit of 500 kilobytes?Â  Just curious as I&#8217;m attempting to upload a few pictures to Flickr.com through their web site and hitting a size limit &#8211; pretty sure it&#8217;s not Panera.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if there&#8217;s a size limit which Panera has their wireless routers set to limit the size of files that are able to be transferred via HTTP based web methods.Â  Anyone else run across this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/12/02/panera-packet-size-limitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Increases gMail storage limit&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/14/google-increases-gmail-storage-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/14/google-increases-gmail-storage-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/10/14/google-increases-gmail-storage-limit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the first thing that I think of when reading through the Google Operating System last night and came across this article regarding the storage capacity of gMail and how it&#8217;s going to go to Hotmail&#8217;s limit of 5 GB and add 1 GB on top of it.&#160; Google eloquently termed this &#34;Infinity + 1&#34; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the first thing that I think of when reading through the <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com" target="_blank">Google Operating System</a> last night and came across <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/10/gmails-storage-increases-dramatically.html" target="_blank">this</a> article regarding the storage capacity of gMail and how it&#8217;s going to go to Hotmail&#8217;s limit of 5 GB and add 1 GB on top of it.&#160; Google eloquently termed this &quot;<a href="https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=mail&amp;ltmpl=wyze" target="_blank">Infinity + 1</a>&quot; back in the day.&#160; I like to think of it more along the &quot;These go to 11&quot; terminology.&#160; So they link back to the <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/more-gmail-storage-coming-for-all.html" target="_blank">official gmail blog</a> article regarding the increase in storage.&#160; Holy moly!&#160; Overnight I went from about 2.9 GB to 3.3 GB &#8211; wow.&#160; And what&#8217;s better, my <a href="http://www.google.com/a/" target="_blank">Google Apps</a> e-mail account now has a whopping 25 GB of e-mail storage <img src='http://uvageek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#160; This made me smile though:</p>
<p><a href="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/google-inifinity-plus-one.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="480" alt="google_inifinity_plus_one" src="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/google-inifinity-plus-one-thumb.jpg" width="490" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>and chuckle a little bit thinking to myself, &quot;Dang, that&#8217;s sweet.&quot;</p>
<p>Emerson, Lake &amp; Palmer &#8211; The Best of Emerson, Lake &amp; Palmer &#8211; C&#8217;est la Vie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/14/google-increases-gmail-storage-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft SharePoint Server 2007 &#8211; The (in)Complete Reference</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/05/microsoft-sharepoint-server-2007-the-incomplete-reference/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/05/microsoft-sharepoint-server-2007-the-incomplete-reference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/10/05/microsoft-sharepoint-server-2007-the-incomplete-reference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love it when I order books off of Amazon.com before books go to press, building a library and wealth of information and knowledge to slurp up into my mind.&#160; Primarily I like the ordering before the book goes to press part, primarily because it means that I&#8217;m going to get something that I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when I order books off of Amazon.com before books go to press, building a library and wealth of information and knowledge to slurp up into my mind.&#160; Primarily I like the ordering before the book goes to press part, primarily because it means that I&#8217;m going to get something that I&#8217;m not quite certain of its contents before I actually get it.</p>
<p>So I received &quot;The Complete Reference &#8211; Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007&quot; by David Sterling yesterday.&#160; Looks like a decent resource, similar to the majority of other SharePoint 2007 books released recently, however there&#8217;s just one catch it&#8217;s not &quot;complete&quot;.&#160; There are several topics that there&#8217;s nothing there on.&#160; I suppose these are the topics that I&#8217;ll continue to write about in my own book <img src='http://uvageek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By no means am I stating that the book is a sham, it&#8217;s actually quite good and having known David, it definitely reads like he&#8217;s writing it; additionally he really does bring together quite a bit of information that you&#8217;d have to search around for hours (maybe days) over on Microsoft&#8217;s TechNet site before you&#8217;d ever find it, especially since he&#8217;s bringing the information all together into one spot.&#160; I can only hope that my first book is somewhere close to that.</p>
<p>Acappella &#8211; Worship 2 &#8211; Mourning into Dancing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/10/05/microsoft-sharepoint-server-2007-the-incomplete-reference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing map of the Internet&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/09/06/amazing-map-of-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/09/06/amazing-map-of-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life as we know it...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/09/06/amazing-map-of-the-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;So there have been several maps of the Internet generated over the years, but I definitely have to say that this one is the most clever in that it takes after the London Underground map, or at least in the same style.&#160; For the original story, hit up the Independent here.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;So there have been several maps of the Internet generated over the years, but I definitely have to say that this one is the most clever in that it takes after the London Underground map, or at least in the same style.&nbsp; For the original story, hit up the <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article2931747.ece" target="_blank">Independent here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/web1-254562a.jpg" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="724" alt="web1_254562a" src="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/web1-254562a-thumb.jpg" width="1024" border="0"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/09/06/amazing-map-of-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Pack 4 Released</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/google-pack-4-released/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/google-pack-4-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/google-pack-4-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;So there&#8217;s much buzz around the Internet community with Google&#8217;s recent release of Google Pack 4&#160;hailing Google for packaging StarOffice 8&#160;as a part of the Google Pack.&#160; I think it&#8217;s pretty clever that they&#8217;ve worked out a deal with Sun Microsystems&#160;to be able to add this as a part of the pack considering that really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;So there&#8217;s much <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/08/google-pack-adds-staroffice.html" target="_blank">buzz</a> around the Internet community with <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>&#8217;s recent release of <a href="http://pack.google.com" target="_blank">Google Pack 4</a>&nbsp;hailing Google for packaging <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/star/staroffice/index.jsp" target="_blank">StarOffice 8</a>&nbsp;as a part of the Google Pack.&nbsp; I think it&#8217;s pretty clever that they&#8217;ve worked out a deal with <a href="http://www.sun.com" target="_blank">Sun Microsystems</a>&nbsp;to be able to add this as a part of the pack considering that really it&#8217;s only available free to faculty, researchers and students (or at least that&#8217;s the rumor&#8230;).&nbsp; Some of the buzz on this was whether or not StarOffice would be as snappy as Microsoft Office is considering that it takes a minute or two to kick up on our friendly <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a> distribution.</p>
<p>I of course take the counter vantage point that is stepping back and looking at GP as a whole.&nbsp; Why can&#8217;t I download it if I&#8217;m a Windows XP x64 user?</p>
<p><a href="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/googlepack.png" atomicselection="true"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="167" alt="googlepack" src="http://uvageek.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/googlepack-thumb.png" width="240" align="right" border="0"></a>It would seem quite reasonable to me to be able to pull down and use a copy since I&#8217;m sure that Google Engineers use the x64 edition of Windows XP since it&#8217;s a little more solid (so it shares the same kernel as Windows Server 2003, is that what&#8217;s confusing you Google Pack?).</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s that mean for me, downloading individual components if I can and running them.&nbsp; Guess I&#8217;ll have to come back some other time and hope to be able to get a copy of the <a href="http://pack.google.com/screensaver.html" target="_blank">Google Photos Screensaver</a>.</p>
<p>As a caveat, yes, I&#8217;m using the 32-bit edition of the web browser and it still doesn&#8217;t see me as Windows XP 32-bit edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/google-pack-4-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live SkyDrive, GSpace, or S3 from Amazon?</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/live-skydrive-gspace-or-s3-from-amazon/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/live-skydrive-gspace-or-s3-from-amazon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/live-skydrive-gspace-or-s3-from-amazon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So recently I&#8217;ve come to find that I need a single point for files to work on, not necessarily collaborate on, but at least have a single point that I can dump data out to and feel confident that I&#8217;ll be able to access it from where ever I am.
SharePoint ServicesRight off the bat of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So recently I&#8217;ve come to find that I need a single point for files to work on, not necessarily collaborate on, but at least have a single point that I can dump data out to and feel confident that I&#8217;ll be able to access it from where ever I am.</p>
<p><strong>SharePoint Services<br /></strong>Right off the bat of course I think to myself, I can just setup my Dell Dimension 8300 at home to act as a document library leveraging Windows SharePoint Services version 3.0 on top of a Windows Server 2003 platform.&nbsp; Nice option, but the only problem is that occasionally my roommates inadvertently down our network.&nbsp; Now that&#8217;s not to say that a third party service provider might not have the same problem, but more than likely they&#8217;re co-located and have their operation together with 24&#215;7 support of some sort (someone carries a pager at least eh?)</p>
<p><strong>Live SkyDrive<br /></strong>Microsoft <a href="http://skydrive.live.com/" target="_blank">Live SkyDrive</a>&nbsp;is currently in beta and supports up to 500 MB.&nbsp; Looks to have some decent integration with MSIE 7.0 (sorry, I don&#8217;t have any machines still running 6.0).&nbsp; It seems to be pretty snappy and have the Web 2.0 kind of feel to it as you&#8217;re able to get a little bit of asynchronous action going on here and there.&nbsp; Not quite sure what the pricing scheme is going to be, but I think that there are some blogs out there that have mentioned what it&#8217;s going to be.&nbsp; Overall, not too shabby for a Microsoft product and it seems to have integration across the field through the <a href="http://www.live.com" target="_blank">Live</a>&nbsp;product suite.</p>
<p><strong>GSpace and GMail Drive Extension</strong><br />So in reality, this isn&#8217;t really <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>&nbsp;having any sort of storage offering, yet, but rather a <a href="http://www.getgspace.com/index.html" target="_blank">Mozilla FireFox plugin</a> that allows you to use your mailbox like a file cabinet.&nbsp; It seems to be relatively snappy, nothing crazy fast, but remember that in a way you&#8217;re voiding your warranty on your <a href="http://www.gmail.com" target="_blank">gMail</a>&nbsp;account (user be warned).&nbsp; Now if you&#8217;re interested in something that will integrate with your Windows Explorer interface, I would then recommend you to the <a href="http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm" target="_blank">GMail Drive shell extension</a>&nbsp;which is useful, but again it&#8217;s got its own set of issues and you&#8217;re attempting to make your gMail account more than what it was initially set out to be for.</p>
<p>There is some talk however that there will be a <a href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>&nbsp;storage offering coming soon with the ability to pay for additional server space.&nbsp; The folks over at <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Google Operating System</a>&nbsp;(unofficial news and tips from Google) have an article from <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/08/pay-for-more-gmail-storage.html" target="_blank">August 9</a> detailing the cost structuring of Google Services.&nbsp; Quite interesting if you want to move all your photos over to the Google side of things with <a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/" target="_blank">Picasa Web</a>&nbsp;and have a storage quota that goes across all of your Google Services (notebook, docs and spreadsheets, reader, mail, etc.) all wrapped up into a single service fee.</p>
<p><strong>S3 from Amazon<br /></strong>The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html?node=16427261" target="_blank">Amazon Simple Storage Service</a> is a pretty sweet service provider that&#8217;s snappy, redundant and cheap.&nbsp; The only problem is that <a href="http://www.amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a> doesn&#8217;t provide an interface to it other than leveraging the web services API that it comes with.&nbsp; So what&#8217;s that mean to the average user?&nbsp; They&#8217;re more than likely never going to step foot on the moon, no wait, they&#8217;re never going to use S3 which is tragic.&nbsp; There are several tools out there that will do everything from synchronize your data folder to and from S3 to just a plain interface through the a <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/firefox" target="_blank">Mozilla Firefox</a> Plugin named <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3247" target="_blank">Amazon S3 Firefox Organizer</a> or <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3247" target="_blank">S3Fox</a> for short.</p>
<p>It seems to work for the most part and is slick and consolidated and blends in with the interface of Firefox, but doesn&#8217;t seem to have the greatest error reporting.&nbsp; The best part of it however is that it&#8217;s free.</p>
<p><strong>Decision point&#8230;<br /></strong>So which service are you going to go with for your file storage needs?&nbsp; Should I even bring up <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.xdrive.com" target="_blank">XDrive</a>?&nbsp; Right now I&#8217;m leaning toward leveraging the S3 service, however I have to admit that the SkyDrive interface is pretty nice and allows for a simple permissions model.&nbsp; Likewise the Google system though it works through your mailbox right now, I&#8217;m sure that they&#8217;ll deploy something out there soon that is cross platform compatible, fast and cheap as well, just a matter of time.</p>
<p>Listening to Antonin Dvorak &#8211; Dvorak Symphonies Nos. 8 &amp; 9 &#8211; Symphony No. 9 Iii. Scherzo. Molto Vivace</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="7dc1bd33-94bd-46fd-a20b-0131235bcd47:8f5e486b-d0d1-487b-aa5b-02ba4b4517ba" contenteditable="false" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="400" border="0" unselectable="on">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="400">
<p><a title="Amazon.com: Dvor?k: Symphonies Nos. 8 &#038; 9 "New World": Music: Antonin Dvorak,Herbert von Karajan,Berliner Philharmoniker" href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0009NDKX2/u015-20">Amazon.com: Dvor?k: Symphonies Nos. 8 &#038; 9 &#8220;New World&#8221;: Music: Antonin Dvorak,Herbert von Karajan,Berliner Philharmoniker</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/08/12/live-skydrive-gspace-or-s3-from-amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who really owns iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://uvageek.net/2007/01/13/who-really-owns-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://uvageek.net/2007/01/13/who-really-owns-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvageek.net/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a blog posting published on ZD net, Cisco may not in fact really own the iPhone name that they claim to.  Definitely should be an interesting court case.  If anything I&#8217;m surprised that NTP, Inc. hasn&#8217;t jumped on Yahoo!&#8217;s back for their &#8220;push&#8221; e-mail system that they&#8217;re going to deploy with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=236" target="_blank">a blog posting</a> published on <a href="http://www.zdnet.com" target="_blank">ZD net</a>, Cisco may not in fact really own the iPhone name that they claim to.  Definitely should be an interesting court case.  If anything I&#8217;m surprised that <a href="http://www.ntp-inc.com" target="_blank">NTP, Inc</a>. hasn&#8217;t jumped on <a href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo!</a>&#8217;s back for their &#8220;push&#8221; e-mail system that they&#8217;re going to deploy with the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone" target="_blank">iPhone</a>.</p>
<p>So the real question is what is it that we can expect to see in the next six months before the <a href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">Apple</a> iPhone deploys to market.  Stay tuned (not zuned) <img src='http://uvageek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uvageek.net/2007/01/13/who-really-owns-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
